Business Development

Why Law Firm Pitch Decks Do Not Win Business

The design is usually fine. The problem is that most pitch presentations are about the firm rather than about the client's decision. Here is what winning presentations do differently.

10 min read

When a law firm's pitch conversion rate is low, the instinct is often to improve the materials. Better design. Cleaner layouts. More consistent brand application. More compelling matter examples.

The materials are rarely the problem. The problem is the underlying theory of what a pitch presentation is for. Most pitch decks are built to present the firm. The client invited the firm to present because they are trying to make a decision. These are related but different goals, and the deck that serves one does not automatically serve the other.

What the client is actually evaluating

A client sitting in a pitch is trying to answer three questions. Can this firm handle the specific matter at hand? Do I trust the team in the room? Is the value I am getting worth what they will charge me?

Everything in the pitch presentation should be designed to help the client answer those three questions confidently. A slide on the firm's history does not address any of them. A slide showing the team's combined years of experience does not address any of them. A slide describing the firm's full range of practice areas does not address any of them.

These slides exist because they are easy to produce and feel comprehensive. They do not exist because they help the client decide.

The opening that loses the room

Most pitch presentations open with a firm overview. Sometimes it is a video. Sometimes it is two slides covering offices, headcount, and practice areas. Either way, the message is: before we get to your situation, let us tell you about us.

The client already knows enough about the firm to have invited them. The overview is rarely new information. It also consumes time that should be spent on the client's situation, and it signals that the presenting team's primary interest is in being understood rather than in understanding.

The most effective pitch opens with a precise statement of the client's situation as the firm understands it. This demonstrates preparation. It also creates an immediate opportunity for the client to correct the firm's understanding, which is valuable. A firm that gets the client's situation wrong on slide two can recover and build credibility by receiving the correction gracefully. A firm that gets it wrong and does not know until the end of the pitch loses the engagement without understanding why.

The team introduction problem

Team introduction slides typically show a photo, a title, years of experience, and a list of representative matters. The client looks at the slide and learns that this person has done related work for unnamed clients in unspecified situations with undescribed outcomes.

A more useful team introduction describes what specific relevant experience each person brings to this specific situation and what role they will play. The client's concern is not whether the attorneys have had long careers. It is whether those careers produced the knowledge and judgment needed for this matter.

Equally important: the team in the room must be the team that handles the matter. Clients remember when senior attorneys show up for the pitch and disappear after engagement. The team presented in the pitch is a commitment.

Leaving time for conversation

A pitch that runs to the end of the allotted time has not left room for the client to ask the questions that actually drive their decision. Those questions, about how the firm handles a specific type of situation, about communication style, about billing practices, are often the ones that determine the outcome.

Effective pitch teams plan to cover their material in sixty to seventy percent of the available time and treat the remaining time as a conversation. A client who leaves a pitch having had a substantive conversation with the attorneys feels differently about the firm than a client who sat through a presentation. The relationship begins in that conversation, not in the deck.

Related reading